News

When Your Boss Edits Your Work With ChatGPT, Badly

A letter published Monday to the workplace-advice column Ask a Manager describes a problem more workers are likely to recognize: a manager who runs an employee's writing through ChatGPT, then hands it back worse than it started. It is one reader's account, not a verified event, but it crystallizes a tension now playing out across offices — AI has become a coworker, and not everyone wields it well.

The writer, who works in a public-facing writing field, says days of drafting routinely get fed into ChatGPT and "regurgitated back out," returning in a tone and wording that bear little resemblance to the original. On a major project, the boss handed back "revisions" that were "completely different," then admitted the tool had taken the copy in a direction the team did not want. The cleanup landed back on the employee, on a tight deadline.

Columnist Alison Green advised treating that botched edit as an opening rather than a grievance. She suggested proposing a concrete process change — offering to write final versions the boss can approve or mark up directly, "rather than putting them through AI" — and framing it around the manager's strained time. Green also urged the writer to weigh whether the boss's pre-ChatGPT edits had genuinely improved the work, since that changes the conversation.

The scenario is not an outlier. According to Pew Research Center, among U.S. workers who have used AI chatbots on the job, editing written content is one of the most common uses, cited by 52 percent — second only to research. As employers fold these tools into everyday workflows, friction over how they are used is becoming a routine feature of work, not a rare one.

What this means for job seekers

For early-career employees and job seekers, the lesson is less about the tool than about the etiquette forming around it. Pushing back on a manager's misuse of AI is a skill worth practicing now: name the outcome ("this version created more work, not less"), propose a process instead of a complaint, and tie it to your boss's priorities. That diplomatic framing — the approach Green models — travels well into interviews, where "tell me about a time you disagreed with a manager" is a standard prompt. Our guide to job searching in the AI era covers how to talk about these tradeoffs without sounding either anti-AI or uncritical.

The flip side is opportunity. Fluency with these tools is fast becoming a hiring differentiator, especially for candidates who can show judgment about when not to use them. An applicant who can help a stretched team build a sane review process — knowing where AI saves time and where it quietly destroys it — is selling something employers increasingly need. For those still building that footing, our new-grad remote job guide walks through positioning that edge. The workers who thrive will not be the ones who defer to the AI or reject it outright, but the ones who can supervise it and say so out loud.